Re: IBIS PENDING VERSION 3.0 DOCUMENTS

Andy:

This is my mistake. The ver3_0.ibs file has been updated in the
wip directory that the document is UNOFFICIAL PENDING.

Bob Ross
Interconnectix

> Date: Mon, 9 Jun 97 09:48:42 EDT
> From: Andy Ingraham <ingraham@wrksys.ENET.dec.com>
> To: ibis@vhdl.org
> Cc: ingraham@wrksys.ENET.dec.com
> Apparently-To: ibis@vhdl.org
> Subject: Re: IBIS PENDING VERSION 3.0 DOCUMENTS
> Status: RO

> May I suggest clearly identifying any IBIS spec work-in-progress
> documents as being preliminary, within the document itself?

> I have maybe a dozen copies of the version 2.1 spec in my mailbox,
> including one that is identified as the "official, ratified IBIS 2.1
> specification." They all differ from the three versions of
> "version 2.1" on vhdl.org (which ought to have been given different
> minor revision numbers ... but that's yet another matter).

> Please, put something RIGHT WITHIN THE DOCUMENT ITSELF, identifying it
> as an unapproved version, until it has actually been approved.

> I suggest adding the word "UNAPPROVED" to the second line, the one
> that identifies the spec version.

> Regards,
> Andy Ingraham

 
Received on Mon Jun 9 09:10:03 1997